Published Research

UV222 Published Research

Far-UVC light at 222 nm has attracted global interest as a safe and effective technology for reducing harmful microbes in air, on surfaces, and even in clinical settings. Unlike conventional UV-C light, 222 nm far-UVC can inactivate viruses, bacteria, and fungi while remaining safe for human skin and eyes.

This page brings together peer-reviewed research and independent studies that explore the effectiveness, safety, and real-world applications of UV222 technology. Each section below highlights published studies, with links and short descriptions for quick reference.

Safety & Health Impact

222 nm Light Effective in Occupied Spaces

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of far-UVC (222 nm) light in reducing transmission of viruses (including coronaviruses) in occupied indoor settings and found promising virus inactivation with minimal harm to humans.

Read Article >

Review Confirms Far-UVC Safety & Effectiveness

This paper reviews evidence showing that far-UVC (around 222 nm) light can safely deactivate airborne viruses and microbes, making it a promising tool for reducing infection risk in occupied indoor spaces.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC Shown Safe for Eye Tissues

The researchers exposed rats’ eyes to both 222 nm and 254 nm UV light and found that 222 nm caused no corneal damage, whereas 254 nm led to visible damage, suggesting 222 nm is much safer for eye tissues.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC Safer Than Sunlight for Skin Cells

A computer modelling study suggests that far-UVC (around 222 nm) causes dramatically less DNA damage (in the form of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers) in skin cells than typical sunlight exposure—even under different climate scenarios.

Read Article Now >

Bacteria, Wounds & Antimicrobial Resistance

Far-UVC Effective Against Resistant Bacteria

This paper shows that far-UVC (around 222 nm) light can kill bacteria (including drug-resistant ones) without noticeable damage to human skin, making it a promising disinfection method for use around people.

Read Article >

Far-UVC Eliminates 99.8% of Airborne Virus

In a real-world test in an occupied room where mice cages are cleaned, 222 nm far-UVC light cut the level of infectious airborne virus by about 99.8% — nearly eliminating it.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC in Wound Care: Gentle & Effective

The paper discusses clinical experiences using 222 nm far-UVC in wound care and explores how it might safely reduce infections while being gentle on human skin.

Read Article Now >

Hospital Study Confirms Far-UVC Effectiveness

In a hospital waiting room, 222 nm lamps significantly cut bacterial counts on surfaces and in the air.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC: A Safer Solution to Drug-Resistant Infections

This review evaluates evidence suggesting that 222 nm far-UVC light can kill dangerous bacteria (including MRSA) in hospitals while being safer for human skin than conventional UVC, making it a promising tool against drug-resistant infections.

Read Article Now >

222 nm Light Kills Microbes Without Skin or Eye Harm

This study demonstrates that far-UVC light (around 222 nm) can effectively kill microbes (like bacteria and viruses) in air and on surfaces without causing harm to mammalian skin or eyes.

Read Article Now >

Airborne Virus & Infection Control

Three-Year Far-UVC Study in Long Term Care Facilities

This trial is testing whether installing 222 nm “far-UVC” light devices in common areas of long-term care homes can reduce respiratory viral infections compared to placebo lights, over a three-year period. In conclusion -Far-UVC light offers a low maintenance, passive intervention to mitigate the spread of RVIs in LTC facilities.

Read Article >

Indoor Air Effects of Far-UVC in Hotels

The researchers tested using 222 nm far-UVC lights in a hotel quarantine setting and found that turning on the lights led to small increases in indoor ozone levels (though still below outdoor levels) but did not clearly affect ultra-fine particle concentrations.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC Cuts Airborne Bacteria by 90%

In a room-scale experiment using filtered 222 nm far-UVC lamps, the researchers showed they could reduce airborne bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) by over 90% under safe exposure levels in just minutes.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC Achieves 98.4% Reduction of Staphylococcus

In a room-sized experimental chamber, filtered 222 nm far-UVC lamps reduced airborne Staphylococcus aureus by about 98.4% (while operating within safety exposure limits), showing strong potential for inactivating airborne pathogens.

Read Article Now >

Far-UVC Proven Effective Against Coronaviruses

This research showed that 222 nm far-UVC light can deactivate coronaviruses in the air, while being safe for humans.

Read Article Now >

Broad-Spectrum Disinfection with 222 nm Light

This research demonstrates that 222 nm UVC is effective at inactivating a broad range of viruses, bacteria, and other microbes.

Read Article Now >

Environmental & Technical Factors

Far-UVC: A Safer Tool for Pandemic Control

This review argues that far-UVC (200–230 nm) light is a promising way to kill airborne pathogens while being much safer for human skin and eyes compared to conventional UV-C.

Read Article >

Mapping UV Wavelengths for Pathogen Disinfection

This work maps how effective different UV wavelengths are at killing microbes, aiding in validation of disinfection systems.

Read Article Now >

Reviews, Guidance & Perspectives

New UV Light Keeps Indoor Air Clean

An overview article discussing how new 222 nm UV technology could make indoor air safer by continuously disinfecting in occupied spaces.

Read Article >

Guidance on UV-C Standards in Healthcare

This piece offers guidance and viewpoints on how to standardize UV-C disinfection practices in hospitals.

Read Article Now >